Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Villanova Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Print Articles
    • Tolle Lege Articles
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Copyright
  • Symposia
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:10467/feed
ISSN 0042-6229
Print Articles
Vol. 60, Issue 2, 2015October 01, 2015 EDT

The District Court Tried to Make Me Go to Rehab, The Eleventh Circuit Said “No, No, No”: The Divide over Rehabilitation’s Role in Criminal Sentencing and the Need for Reform Following United States v. Vandergrift

Kristen Ashe,
criminal reformsentencingcrimi
Photo by Larry Farr on Unsplash
Villanova Law Review
Kristen Ashe, The District Court Tried to Make Me Go to Rehab, The Eleventh Circuit Said “No, No, No”: The Divide over Rehabilitation’s Role in Criminal Sentencing and the Need for Reform Following United States v. Vandergrift, 60 Villanova Law Review 283 (2015).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system