ISSN 0042-6229
Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2015December 01, 2015 EDT
An “Officer” and a G[old]man: The Third Circuit Finds Ambiguous Corporate Titles Jeopardize Right to Advancement Under Delaware Law in Aleynikov v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
An “Officer” and a G[old]man: The Third Circuit Finds Ambiguous Corporate Titles Jeopardize Right to Advancement Under Delaware Law in Aleynikov v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Articles in Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2015
Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2015
- Arbitration Agreement Arbitrage?: Statutory Discrepancy Leads to Third Circuit Victory for Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Defendants in Khazin v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.John K. Lisman
- Bragging Rights Restored: The Third Circuit Allows Attorneys to Quote Complimentary Remarks from Judicial Opinions for Advertising in Dwyer v. CappellNicole Holden
- An "Officer" and a G[old]man: The Third Circuit Finds Ambiguous Corporate Titles Jeopardize Right to Advancement Under Delaware Law in Aleynikov v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Carina M. Meleca
- Martin Luther King, Jr. Lecture - "A Love Supreme "Gregory S. Parks
- Taking a Stand on Standing: The Third Circuit Widens the Circuit Split by Narrowing Private Antitrust Standing Under the "Consumer-or-Competitor" TestElizabeth Giordano
- If at First You Don 't Succeed, Try, Try, Try Again: The Third Circuit Strikes Down Prevailing Wage Rule Once More in Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas v. PerezSara Moyer
Carina M. Meleca, An “Officer” and a G[Old]Man: The Third Circuit Finds Ambiguous Corporate Titles Jeopardize Right to Advancement Under Delaware Law in Aleynikov v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 60 Villanova Law Review 781 (2015).