ISSN 0042-6229
Vol. 60, Issue 2, 2015October 01, 2015 EDT
The First Circuit Strikes Out in Jones v. City of Boston: A Pitch for Practical Significance in Disparate Impact Cases
The First Circuit Strikes Out in Jones v. City of Boston: A Pitch for Practical Significance in Disparate Impact Cases
Articles in Vol. 60, Issue 2, 2015
Vol. 60, Issue 2, 2015
- The District Court Tried to Make Me Go to Rehab, The Eleventh Circuit Said "No, No, No": The Divide over Rehabilitation's Role in Criminal Sentencing and the Need for Reform Following United States v. VandergriftKristen Ashe
- The Rights of Shareholders in Authorizing Corporate PhilanthropyJohn A. Pearce II
- Shut the State Court's Doors: Diversity Jurisdiction over National Banks in the Ninth Circuit's Rouse v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSBMelissa Siravo Hensinger
- Sit… Stay… Now Beg for Me: A Look at the Courthouse Dogs Program and the Legal Standard Pennsylvania Should Use to Determine Whether a Dog Can Accompany a Child on the Witness StandMatthew Kaiser
- What to Expect When Someone is Expecting For You: New Jersey Needs to Protect Parties to Gestational Surrogacy Agreements Following In Re T.J.S.Melissa Ruth
- The First Circuit Strikes Out in Jones v. City of Boston: A Pitch for Practical Significance in Disparate Impact CasesMichael Stenger
Michael Stenger, The First Circuit Strikes Out in Jones v. City of Boston: A Pitch for Practical Significance in Disparate Impact Cases, 60 Villanova Law Review 411 (2015).