ISSN 0042-6229
Vol. 65, Issue 5, 2020February 04, 2021 EDT
Persistent Structural Barriers to Gender Equity in the Legal Academy and the Efforts of Two Legal Writing Organizations to Break Them Down
Persistent Structural Barriers to Gender Equity in the Legal Academy and the Efforts of Two Legal Writing Organizations to Break Them Down
Articles in Vol. 65, Issue 5, 2020
Vol. 65, Issue 5, 2020
- Women Law Professors: The First Century (1896-1996)Catherine J. Lanctot
- Leadership Lapse: Laundering Systemic Bias Through Student EvaluationsDebra Austin
- The Intersectionality of Law Librarianship and GenderJamie J. Baker
- Shouting into the Wind: How the ABA Standards Promote Inequality in Legal Education, and What Law Students and Faculty Should do About itMary Beth Beazley
- "You Should Smile More," Academic Catcalling, and Women-on-Women CrimesDeborah L. Borman
- Law School Dean Wanted: A Woman for All ReasonsSusan Hanley DuncanKaren LottCatherine Pettis
- Fostering Equity and Inclusion Across the Gender Spectrum in the Law School ClassroomStevie Leahy
- Institutional Service, Student Care-work, and Misogyny: Naming the Problem and Mitigating the HarmMary A. LynchAndrea A. Curcio
- Legal Education as Hegemonic MasculinityDara E. Purvis
- Persistent Structural Barriers to Gender Equity in the Legal Academy and the Efforts of Two Legal Writing Organizations to Break Them DownRuth Anne RobbinsKristen K. TiscioneMelissa H. Weresh
- In Search of Best Practices on Gender Equity for University Faculty: An UpdateConstance Z. Wagner
Ruth Anne Robbins, Kristen K. Tiscione & Melissa H. Weresh, Persistent Structural Barriers to Gender Equity in the Legal Academy and the Efforts of Two Legal Writing Organizations to Break Them Down, 65 Villanova Law Review 1155 (2021).